Configuring the distribution database in an Availability Group

I 💜 Replication

Starting with SQL Server 2017 CU6 and SQL Server 2016 SP2-CU3, you can now configure your distribution database as part of an Availability Group (AG). Up until now, your distribution database could only be part of a standalone instance, or failover cluster instance (FCI). In this first round, there’s a pretty big list of limitations & restrictions. In fact, you’ll notice that the “supported scenarios” list is shorter than the “limitations or exclusions.”

But I ran into a problem

Obviously I had a problem. All my blog posts come about because I had a problem. Except in this case, everything was working great… I just didn’t understand why.

The tooling/GUIs around Replication aren’t always the greatest. This means I end up digging into the distribution database to query it directly every once in a while. Sometimes, I’ll run a query like this to grab the list of publishers:

SELECT  ServerID            = s.server_id, 
        ServerName          = s.name,
        p.*
FROM dbo.MSpublications AS p
JOIN sys.servers AS s ON s.server_id = p.publisher_id;

This has always worked super, and has been a go-to query for me for years. But when looking at a SQL Server 2017 distributor with the distribution database in an Availability Group, that wasn’t working. All the publications had a publisher_id of 1, but in sys.servers, server_id 1 was some random linked server, and definitely not the publisher. But replication was working great. Maybe replication was set up on the other AG replica, and server_id 1 came from there.

Nope. On the other replica, it was the same story. Server_id 1 was a random linked server, and nothing to do with replication at all, let alone the publisher. But replication was working perfectly. A teammate fooling around with it in dev confirmed that if he updated the publisher_id to match the server_id we thought it should join to, replication stopped working. So, that publisher_id of 1 was correct. Or special. But also definitely different than what I’ve seen in prior versions of SQL Server.

It makes sense, really

I thought about it, and it makes sense that the distribution database, when in an AG, can’t just join directly to sys.servers based on an ID value. Different replicas could have pre-existing linked servers, and keeping server_id in sync across all the distributor replicas would be impossible. It would make a lot more sense if it were just to rely on server name. But… That’s not how it worked. And dbo.MSpublications doesn’t include the server name, it’s just got that darned ID value. So, maybe there’s a table in the distribution database that it uses instead of sys.servers. Sure enough, there it was, hiding in plain sight: dbo.MSreplservers. I just have to add a join to this table in between dbo.MSpublications and sys.servers.

SELECT  master_ServerID     = s.server_id, 
        master_ServerName   = s.name,
        dist_ServerID       = rs.srvid,
        dist_ServerName     = rs.srvname,
        p.*
FROM dbo.MSpublications AS p
JOIN dbo.MSreplservers AS rs ON rs.srvid = p.publisher_id
JOIN sys.servers AS s ON s.name = rs.srvname;

In hindsight, this actually makes a lot more sense than the code I’ve written in the past. It’s a bit confusing that dbo.MSreplservers has a srvid that is different from the server_id in sys.servers for the same server. But… c’est la vie. AGs make everything just a little bit more complicated.

1 Comment

  1. Hi Andy

    I faced similar issue recently where my SQL script for publication detection stops working when using SQL Server 2016 SP2-CU3 or higher. Reason is same, i.e. the join s.server_id = p.publisher_id no longer works. After reading your post, I now understand the reason. However, I could not find any information related to dbo.MSreplservers table in Microsoft documentation. I wonder if you managed to find anything in Microsoft documentation for this table?

    Regards
    Nauman

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. The Distribution Database and AGs – Curated SQL

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.